A new scale to assess health-facility level management: The development and validation of the Facility Management Scale in Ghana, Uganda, and Malawi

Author:

Mubiri Paul1,Ssengooba Freddie1,O’Byrne Thomasena2,Keremani Adelaine1,Namakula Justine1,Chikaphupha Kingsley3,Aikins Moses4,Martineau Tim5,Vallières Frédérique2

Affiliation:

1. Makerere University

2. Trinity College Dublin

3. Research for Equity and Community Health (REACH) Trust

4. School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana

5. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background The increased recognition of leadership and management as a determinant of health system performance has prompted calls for research focusing on the nature, quality, and measurement of this key health system building block. In low- or middle-income contexts (LMIC), where facility-level management and performance remain a challenge, valid tools to measure leadership and management have the potential to boost performance improvements. We, therefore, sought to develop a Facility-level Management Scale (FMS) and test its reliability in the psychometric properties in three African contexts. Methods The FMS was administered to 881 health workers in; Ghana (n = 287; 32.6%), Malawi (n = 66; 7.5%) and Uganda (n = 528; 59.9%). Half of the sample was randomly subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Monte Carlo Parallel Component Analysis to first explore the FMS’ latent structure. The construct validity of this structure was then tested on the remaining half of the sample using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The FMS’ convergent and divergent validity, as well as internal consistency, were also tested. Results Findings from the EFA and Monte Carlo PCA suggested the retention of three factors (labelled ‘Supportive Management’, ‘Resource Management’ and ‘Time management’). The 3-factor solution explained 51% of the variance in perceived facility management. These results were supported by the results of the CFA (N = 381; χ2 = 256.8, df = 61, p < .001; CFI = .94; TLI = .92; RMSEA [95% CI] = 0.065 [.057–.074]; SRMR = .047). Conclusion The FMS is an open-access, short, easy-to-administer scale that can be used to measure health workers’ perceptions of facility-level management in LMICs. When used as a regular monitoring tool, the FMS can identify key strengths or challenges pertaining to time, resources, and supportive management functions at the health facility level.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3