Evaluation of the implementation of patient decision aid: A mixed-method study

Author:

Tong Wen Ting1,Ng Chirk Jenn1,Lee Yew Kong1,Lee Ping Yein1

Affiliation:

1. Universiti Malaya

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of an insulin-choice PDA specifically measuring implementation outcomes.Methods A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was used. The RE-AIM domains namely “Reach”, “Adoption”, “Implementation”, and “Maintenance” were used to guide evaluation.Results For ‘Reach’, 88.9% (n = 48/54) of doctors and 55% (n = 11/20) of nurses attended the insulin PDA training workshops. This was attributed to their self-motivation and the mandate from the Head of Department. The PDA reached 387 patients and was facilitated by the doctors who delivered the PDA to them and their own desire to know more about insulin. Doctors’ ‘Adoption’ of the PDA was high (83.3%, n = 45/54) due to the positive personal experience with the usefulness of the PDA. Only 65.7% (n = 94/143) of patients who received the PDA read it. The degree of ‘Implementation’ of the PDA varied for different tasks (ranged from 19.2%-84.9%) and was challenged by patient and system barriers. For ‘Maintenance’, 80% of the doctors were willing to continue using the PDA due to its benefits.Conclusion This study highlighted that PDA implementation is promising. Addressing the issues of social hierarchy, and HCPs’ roles and responsibilities can further improve implementation outcomes.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference55 articles.

1. Coulter A, Collins A. Making shared decision-making a reality. No decision about me, without me. Cavendish Square, London: The King’s Fund; 2011.

2. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions;Stacey D;The Cochrane Database of Syst Rev,2017

3. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. Alphabetical List of Decision Aids by Health Topic 2020 [Available from: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/AZlist.html.

4. NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Patient Decision Aids. 2020 [Available from: https://www.evidence.nhs.uk/search?om=%5b%7b%22ety%22:%5b%22Patient%20Decision%20Aids%22%5d%7d,%7b%22srn%22:%5b%22National%20Institute%20for%20Health%20and%20Care%20Excellence%20-%20NICE%22%5d%7d%5d.

5. Shared decision making and use of decision AIDS for localized prostate cancer: perceptions from radiation oncologists and urologists;Wang EH;JAMA Int Med,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3