Effect of ciprofol- and propofol-induced sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy on pharyngeal swallowing function: A prospective experimental study

Author:

He Bin1,Lv Shun1,Liao Jinsong1,Wang Xiong1,Jiang Min1,Song Wen2,Zhang Qiuyu1

Affiliation:

1. Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University

2. Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background Ciprofol and propofol are equally safe and effective in enabling patients to undergo painless gastroscopy. However, the effects of ciprofol on swallowing have not been reported. We aimed to compare the effects of ciprofol and propofol on pharyngeal swallowing function in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods We randomly divided 237 patients aged 22–64 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists class I–II undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy into the ciprofol (Group C, n = 116) or propofol (Group P, n = 121) group. Patients in Group C and Group P received an intravenous bolus injection of 0.6 mg/kg ciprofol and 2.5 mg/kg propofol, respectively, with the injection time exceeding 30 s. Endoscopy was performed when the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score was ≤ 1. The primary outcome was the incidence of severe dysphagia. The Penetration and Aspiration Scale score, Dysphagia Severity Score, occurrence of laryngeal adductor reflex, and arytenoid joint laxity were recorded. The secondary outcomes included the time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit, postoperative recovery time, and incidence of gag reflex, body movement, respiratory depression, hypotension, and postoperative dizziness. Results Group C had a significantly higher incidence of the laryngeal adductor reflex than Group P (54.2% vs. 34.2%, < 0.05), while the incidence of severe dysphagia in Group C was lower than that in Group P (12.9% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.05). The incidence of body movements in Group C was lower than that in Group P (15.5% vs. 31.4%, P < 0.05). Conclusions Compared with propofol, ciprofol may be more beneficial in retaining partial pharyngeal swallowing function to reduce body movements and the risk of aspiration; however, the mechanism requires further investigation. Trial registration: This trial was registered with the China Clinical Trials Centre (Registration Number: ChiCTR2100054446, registration date: 17/12/2021).

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference18 articles.

1. Effects of morphine and midazolam on pharyngeal function, airway protection, and coordination of breathing and swallowing in healthy adults;Hårdemark Cedborg AI;Anesthesiology,2015

2. Pharyngeal function and airway protection during subhypnotic concentrations of propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: volunteers examined by pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry;Sundman E;Anesthesiology,2001

3. Swallowing ability and intra-oral water-retaining ability during moderate propofol sedation in healthy human volunteers: A prospective observational study;Hanamoto H;Eur J Anaesthesiol,2021

4. Comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol in intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients under painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia;Chen X;Contrast Media Mol Imaging,2022

5. Sensory input pathways and mechanisms in swallowing: a review;Steele CM;Dysphagia,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3