The Updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: CFIR 2.0

Author:

Damschroder Laura1ORCID,Reardon Caitlin M.1ORCID,Widerquist Marilla A. Opra1,Lowery Julie C.1

Affiliation:

1. VA Center for Clinical Management Research

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundMany implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real-world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors, however, it has been 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the updated CFIR 2.0, which addresses important user critiques of the framework.MethodsUser feedback was obtained from two sources: 1) a literature review with a systematic search; and 2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR 2009 in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR 2.0 updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2. ResultsThe systematic search yielded 376 articles and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n=134/334) of authors responded to the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items, e.g., applicability, usability, but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR 2.0 include revisions to existing constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes serve to facilitate use of the CFIR, address gaps in themes, and better center recipients. ConclusionThe updates in the CFIR 2.0 reflect feedback from the growing community of CFIR users; although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the CFIR 2009 to ensure longitudinal consistency. We invite users to continuing critiquing the framework in order it continue to evolve.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3