Abstract
AbstractImplementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission is suboptimal in the United States, particularly among people who use drugs (PWUD). PrEP research among PWUD is scarce, and the factors that impact implementation are largely unknown. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review of implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators), as well as the change methods (implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions) that have been evaluated to increase PrEP implementation and use among PWUD. We identified 32 peer-reviewed articles assessing determinants and five that evaluated change methods. Determinants were coded using the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which is an established framework to understand the multilevel barriers and facilitators associated with implementation. Findings indicate that most research was conducted among PrEP recipients (i.e., patients), focusing on awareness and willingness to use PrEP, with less focus on factors impacting clinicians and service delivery systems. Moreover, very few change methods have been evaluated to improve clinician adoption and adherence to CDC guidelines for PrEP provision and/or recipient uptake and adherence to PrEP. Future research is needed that focuses on factors impacting implementation from a clinician standpoint as well as innovative change methods to increase PrEP awareness, reach, adoption, and sustained adherence to guidelines. Implementation Science offers a wealth of knowledge to speed up the effort to end the HIV epidemic in the United States.
Funder
U.S. National Library of Medicine
Third Coast Center for AIDS Research
Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah
National Institute of Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference96 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2017–2021 2023 [https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/hiv-surveillance/vol-28-no-3/index.html. Accessed 9/14/2023.
2. Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Baxter AJ, Charlson FJ, Hall WD et al. Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382(9904):1564-74;10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61530-5.
3. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet. 2008;372(9651):1733–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61311-2.
4. Jennings JM, Wagner J, Tilchin C, Schumacher CM, Thornton N, Hamill MM et al. Methamphetamine Use, Syphilis, and Specific Online Sex Partner Meeting Venues Are Associated With HIV Status Among Urban Black Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex Men. Sex Transm Dis. 2021;48(8s):S32-s9;10.1097/olq.0000000000001452.
5. Compton WM, Jones CM. Substance Use among Men Who Have Sex with Men. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(4):352-6;10.1056/NEJMra2033007.