Optimal Machine Learning- and Deep Learning- driven algorithms for predicting the future value of investments: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Parisi Luca1,Manaog Marianne Lyne2

Affiliation:

1. Coventry University

2. University of Essex

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic and the increasing competitive landscape have led asset management companies to consider investing in applying Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven technologies to minimise the risk and maximise the profitability of the investment funds they manage. Thus, a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the relevant literature were conducted to provide evidence-based informed recommendations on which AI-driven technologies could be leveraged for such purpose. Data on both Machine Learning (ML)- and Deep Learning (DL)-driven technologies applied to aid the management of investment funds in China and, specifically, in and around Shenzhen, were pooled from eleven eligible and recent studies (since 15 September 2017) and analysed accordingly. The key business-relevant and human-interpretable metrics representing their performance were identified in the root mean squared error (RMSE), in the same unit of currency of the investment funds, and the correlation strength between the predicted and actual values. One ML- and one DL-based algorithms were recommended to be used in the short and long terms respectively. In particular, the ML-based Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm was found the most accurate in the relevant literature, e.g., 28.16% more accurate than the Support Vector Regressor (SVR), also having a highly competitive ability to capture trends in the actual values of investment funds (83.7% of correlation strength), whilst the Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM)-GBDT model was identified as the most accurate DL-based algorithm, 15.05% more accurate than the GBDT and with 13.2% higher ability to capture trends in the actual investment funds’ values than the GBDT.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference66 articles.

1. A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism;Alharahsheh HH;Global Acad J Humanit Social Sci,2020

2. Qualitative versus quantitative research strategies: contrasting epistemological and ontological assumptions;Bahari SF,2010

3. Classification accuracy of TMS for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment;Benussi A;Brain Stimul,2021

4. Quantitative research design;Bloomfield J;J Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association,2019

5. The “reproducibility crisis:” Might the methods used frequently in behavior-analysis research help?;Branch MN;Perspect Behav Sci,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating human resources management literacy: A performance analysis of ChatGPT and bard;Heliyon;2024-03

2. The Future of Finance;Advances in Business Information Systems and Analytics;2023-12-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3