Affiliation:
1. University Medical Center Freiburg
Abstract
Abstract
The present study investigated the differences in movement synchrony and therapeutic alliance between solution-focused and problem-focused counseling. Thirty-four participants each attended two counseling sessions with different counselors, one with a solution-focus and one with a problem-focus, in randomized order. The sessions consisted of three consecutive parts: problem description, standardized intervention and free intervention. Movement synchrony, including leading and pacing synchrony, was measured using Motion Energy Analysis (MEA) and windowed cross-lagged correlation (WCLC) based on video recordings of the sessions. The Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) was used to assess therapeutic alliance. Results showed that movement synchrony was higher in solution-focused than in problem-focused counseling (p = .04), driven by differences in the problem description part. This difference may be attributed to allegiance, as we observed more leading synchrony during the problem description part in solution-focused sessions. There was no significant difference in therapeutic alliance between the two conditions. This study expands the understanding of counseling approaches in the field of behavioral synchrony and contributes valuable insights for practitioners and researchers alike.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Alexander, L. B., & Luborsky, L. (1986). The Penn Helping Alliance Scales. In L. S. Greenberg, & W. M. Pinsof (Eds.), The Psychotherapeutic Process: A Research Handbook (pp. 325–356). Guilford Press.
2. Altmann, U. (2011). Investigation of movement synchrony using windowed cross-lagged regression. In A. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, K. Vicsi, C. Pelachaud, & A. Nijholt (Eds.), Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication and Enactment. The Processing Issues (pp. 335–345). Springer.
3. Associations between movement synchrony and outcome in patients with social anxiety disorder: Evidence for treatment specific effects;Altmann U;Psychotherapy Research,2020
4. Der “Helping Alliance Questionnaire” (HAQ) von Luborsky. Möglichkeiten zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Prozesses von stationärer Psychotherapie [The “Helping Alliance Questionnaire” (HAQ) by Luborsky];Bassler M;Psychotherapeut,1995
5. Solution-building conversations: Co-constructing a sense of competence with clients;Berg IK;Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services,1996