A Knotty Problem: Consumer Access and the Regulation of Provider Networks

Author:

Haeder Simon F.1,Weimer David L.2,Mukamel Dana B.3

Affiliation:

1. Pennsylvania State University

2. University of Wisconsin–Madison

3. University of California, Irvine

Abstract

Abstract In order to increase access to medical services, expanding coverage has long been the preferred solution of policy makers and advocates alike. The calculus appeared straightforward: provide individuals with insurance, and they will be able to see a provider when needed. However, this line of thinking overlooks a crucial intermediary step: provider networks. As provider networks offered by health insurers link available medical services to insurance coverage, their breadth mediates access to health care. Yet the regulation of provider networks is technically, logistically, and normatively complex. What does network regulation currently look like and what should it look like in the future? We take inventory of the ways private and public entities regulate provider networks. Variation across insurance programs and products is truly remarkable, not grounded in empirical justification, and at times inherently absurd. We argue that regulators should be pragmatic and focus on plausible policy levers. These include assuring network accuracy, transparency for consumers, and consumer protections from grievous inadequacies. Ultimately, government regulation provides an important foundation for ensuring minimum levels of access and providing consumers with meaningful information. Yet, information is only truly empowering if consumers can exercise at least some choice in balancing costs, access, and quality.

Publisher

Duke University Press

Subject

Health Policy

Reference55 articles.

1. Adler Loren , FiedlerMatthew, GinsburgPaul B., HallMark, TrishErin, YoungChristen Linke, and DuffyErin L.2019. State Approaches to Mitigating Surprise Out-of-Network Billing. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Adler_et-al_State-Approaches-to-Mitigating-Surprise-Billing-2019.pdf.

2. Ahn Sandy , CorletteSabrina, and LuciaKevin. 2016. Can Telemedicine Help Address Concerns with Network Adequacy? Opportunities and Challenges in Six States. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/79551/2000736-Can-Telemedicine-Help-Address-Concerns-with-Network-Adequacy-Opportunities-and-Challenges-in-Six-States.pdf.

3. Brodsky Karen , SmithBarbara, and RodinDiana. 2015. “Making Affordable Care Act Coverage a Reality: A National Examination of Provider Network Monitoring Practices by States and Health Plans.” Health Management Associates, October28. www.healthmanagement.com/knowledge-share/briefs-reports/making-affordable-care-act-coverage-a-reality-a-national-examination-of-provider-network-monitoring-practices-by-states-and-health-plans/.

4. The Effect of Hospital Acquisitions of Physician Practices on Prices and Spending;Capps;Journal of Health Economics,2018

5. CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). 2017. “Guidance to States on Review of Qualified Health Plan Certification Standards in Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces for Plan Years 2018 and Later.” April13. www.cms.gov/cciio/resources/regulations-and-guidance/downloads/qhp-certifcation-reviews-guidance-41317.pdf.

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3