Consumer experiences navigating health care provider directories and support of federal policy action

Author:

Haeder Simon F.1ORCID,Xu Wendy Yi2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA

2. Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractMost Americans rely on managed care networks and provider directories to access care. Little is known about how patients experience navigating directories, how it affects their lives, and whether Americans support federal action on the issue. We fielded a large, and demographically diverse survey of US adults (N = 10,739) from January to April 2022. The survey queried respondents about their experience using provider directories, problems they encountered, and support for federal policy action. Analyses were conducted using Weighted Ordinary Least Squares regression. We found that 43% of Americans used provider directories last year. Among these, provider directory inaccuracy affected 56%, with inaccurate network status (34%), providers having left the practice (18%), and wrong contact information (15%) serving as primary problems. A majority of those using provider directories faced challenges in accessing care subsequently. This included 28% delaying care, 10% seeking out Urgent Care and 6% Emergency Care, respectively, 5% going out of network, and 10% forging care. A substantial number suffered health (54%) and financial (51%) problems as a result and about half took some action as a result. Overall, Americans strongly supported various federal actions to improve directory accuracy. Provider directory inaccuracy affects a larger number of Americans, many of whom are severely affected by the challenges. Broad public support should encourage federal action on the issue.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessing burden tolerance amid the Medicaid Great Unwinding;Public Administration Review;2024-07-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3