Abstract
Much of the existing research on platform work has focused on the role of data and algorithmic management. These new techniques of management need to be critically understood, but there is a risk of overemphasizing the importance and power of these techniques. The obscuring processes of data collection and analysis make it hard to comprehend how data is being used in practice. Less is known about the ways in which workers are resisting these methods, as well as developing new forms of organization that can effectively build on this. This article reflects on the practices of algorithmic management in platform work, considering the limitations of this approach. It considers the ways in which data is, and can be, used in platform work, drawing attention to the limits. While algorithmic management and the collection of data serve a role for capital in platform work—and are increasingly finding broader applications—the article argues that is crucial that research does not lose sight of the role and agency of workers against capital.
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies
Reference50 articles.
1. Alba
Davey
. 2017. “Under Pressure to Prove Its Ads Actually Work, Google Opens Up.” Wired, February21. www.wired.com/2017/02/pressure-prove-ads-actually-work-google-opens/.
2. Commoditized Workers: Case Study Research on Labor Law Issues Arising from a Set of ‘On-Demand/Gig Economy’ Platforms;Aloisi;Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal,2016
3. Too Good to Be True? A Comment on Hall and Krueger’s Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber’s Driver-Partners;Berg;ILR Review,2018
4. Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large Scale Field Experiment;Blake,2014
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献