Affiliation:
1. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
Abstract
Provides a response to Johnson and Nettle’s paper, discussing justifications for the UK welfare state, and associated perceptions of disability and fairness. Rather than the ‘stick’ of sanctions and conditionality, more investment is required in return to work efforts.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference11 articles.
1. Reporting disability in the age of austerity: the changing face of media representation of disability and disabled people in the United Kingdom and the creation of new ‘folk devils;Briant, E.,2013
2. The framing of ‘fairness’ in contesting Neo-liberal austerity;Bunyan, P.,2016
3. Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research;Curato, N.,2017
4. The language of shirkers and scroungers?’ Talking about illness, disability and coalition welfare reform;Garthwaite, K.,2011
5. Shifting the goalposts: a longitudinal mixed-methods study of the health of long-term Incapacity Benefit recipients during a period of substantial change to the UK social security system;Garthwaite, K.,2014
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献