Affiliation:
1. New Jersey Institute of Technology
2. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Using a pragmatic approach, this case study aims to incorporate communication skills in team teaching in light of the literature, describes how communication and teamwork principles play out in online third-year technical writing courses with ethnically diverse international students and faculty from engineering and other STEM majors at an institute of technology in the USA (n = 48). The data were collected using weekly assignments for the semester-long course; and student evaluations of course outcomes. The findings showed that because students wrote weekly short analyses and received weekly feedback, they most often improved their writing skills, such as editing their writings according to American English rules, and transferred learning of rhetorical principles from one setting (analyzing other people’s writing) into another setting as they learnt to work as a team of productive writers.
Publisher
Bogazici University Journal of Education, Bogazici University
Reference78 articles.
1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. [ABET]. (n.d.). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019. http://www.abet.org/accreditation
2. Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding pragmatic markers: A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh University Press.
3. Aizenkot, D., & Ben David, Y. (2022). An exploratory study of 21st century skills of undergraduate education students: A comparison between freshman, second, and graduation years. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(4), 1–10.
4. Altınmakas, D., & Bayyurt, Y. (2019). An exploratory study on factors influencing undergraduate students’ academic writing practices in Turkey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37, 88–103.
5. Alley, M. (November 22, 2022). Why our engineering and science students struggle with writing. Writing as an Engineer or Scientist https://www.craftofscientificwriting.org/struggle.html