Abstract
In this study, first of all, it was important to analyze this technique of returning to the ancient tradition of two outstanding thinkers of the 20th century. M. Heidegger and Sri Aurobindo Ghosh in order to understand to what extent the language of the ancient sages and rishis is still accessible to our understanding; Has it not already happened that the voice of the ancient sages will turn out to be completely foreign to us, like the language of the unconscious, which we do not hear and do not understand? The conducted analysis showed that a certain intellectual conflict arose between Heidegger and the ancient Greeks. This conflict connected with the fact that the German thinker, repeatedly turning to different periods of Greek philosophy and different Greek thinkers and trying to apply to them the phenomenological method of his teacher Husserl, being atheistically minded, never managed to capture the original spiritual intuition of the pre-Socratics in the understanding of being. And at the same time, he himself could not find a suitable name for understanding being in modern culture. Where Heidegger still very carefully writes about the “open clearing” as a manifestation of the truth in the original ancient Greek thinkers, the essence of which, from the point of view of the German thinker, was still given to Heraclitus and Parmenides only intuitively (they did not yet understand the reason for this phenomenon of our consciousness), Sri Aurobindo directly indicates the existence of a connection between the ancient rishis and the existence (revelation) of the gods. Moreover, the processes described by the Indian thinker are very similar to those described by Heidegger. Everything indicates that the thinking of the ancient Greeks and ancient Hindus was very similar. The ancient Greeks (pre-Socratics) tried to understand why our consciousness is given to existence at all, and discovered the existence of inner peace in man – human openness to understanding the existence. Vedic sages, listening to the “voice” of the subconscious, discovered the waves of the subconscious and realized that man is like gods. It is important to note the difference between the pre-Socratics and the ancient Indian rishis in their interpretation of knowledge of existence. For the Greeks, true knowledge of being awakens human existence for knowledge (the logos, the world of naming, the world of concepts). According to the ideas of the ancient Indian rishis, when the gods awakened by man descend into their own world of existence, the consciousness of man in his actual existence also awakens. That is why the truth for the Greeks, according to Heidegger, is the opening and concealment of the truth of being (things), and the truth for the Rishi, according to Sri Aurobindo, is the ascent to true existence together with the gods that awaken in us.
Publisher
Oles Honchar Dnipropetrovsk National University
Reference19 articles.
1. Bogachov, A. (2020). Heidegger and Phenomenology. Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena. London: Bloomsbury. Sententiae, 40(1), 116-119. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.01.116 (іn Ukrainian)
2. Bogachov, A. (2021). On the equivalence of translation of Martin Heidegger’s “Being and Time”. Sententiae, ХL(3), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.31649/sent40.03.083 (іn Ukrainian)
3. Fried, G. (2019). Confronting Heidegger: A Critical Dialogue on Politics and Philosophy (Fried Gregory, Ed.). Séries: New Heidegger Research. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Retrieved May 17, 2024 from https://reviews.ophen.org/2020/09/17/gregory-fried-ed-confronting-heidegger-a-critical-dialogue-on-politics-and-philosophy/?lang=pb
4. Gonzales, F. (2009). Plato and Heidegger: a Question of Dialogue. The Pennsylvania State University Press. University Park.
5. Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? (J.Glenn Gray, trans.) New York, Evanstone, London. Harper & Row, Publishers.