Affiliation:
1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China; MOE Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China; Highway Engineering Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China
Abstract
As a means of predicting the damage pattern and design life of asphalt pavement structures, the reliability of damage analysis is highly dependent on the calculation accuracy of the pavement mechanical responses under wheel load. The nonlinear analysis, on its part, can practically describe the stress dependence of the modulus of granular materials and fine-grained soils, so that the mechanical responses of the wheel-loaded asphalt pavement structure can be obtained more accurately. Therefore, the correct application of nonlinear analysis technology is essential to obtain reliable damage analysis results. For this reason, computer program KENLAYER was utilized to explore the effects of stress adjustment methods and core parameters of nonlinear iterative analysis on the damage analysis results. According to the calculation results, this paper explains the reasons why the stress adjustment Methods 2 and 3 are not applicable to the structural analysis of pavements containing nonlinear granular materials in the case of thin surface layers, illustrates the effects of improper selection of the adjustment methods and each iteration parameter on the dominant damage pattern, finds out the reasons for unreliable calculation results due to improper selection of the iteration parameters, and makes corresponding suggestions for carrying out damage analysis accurately.
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference39 articles.
1. Abubeker, W. A., and Sigurdur, E. (2017). Numerical validation of viscoelastic responses of a pavement structure in a full-scale accelerated pavement test. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(1), 47–59. http://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1039003
2. AI. (1982). Research and development of the Asphalt Institute’s thickness design manual (MS-1), 9th ed. (Research Report 82-2). Asphalt Institute.
3. Alireza, S. (2016). Numerical comparison of flexible pavement dynamic response under different axles. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17(5), 377–387. http://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2014.993195
4. Brundaban, B., Sahoo, U. C., and Mishra, D. (2020). Crosspave: a multi-layer elastic analysis programme considering stress-dependent and cross-anisotropic behaviour of unbound aggregate pavement layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23(6), 1723–1737. http://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1821025
5. Craus, J., Yuce, R., and Monismith, C. L. (1984). Fatigue behavior of thin asphalt concrete layers in flexible pavement structures. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings, 53, 559–582.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献