Affiliation:
1. Darmstadt Technical University
2. Katzenbach GmbH
3. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Abstract
Soil, or soil structure modulus of deformation, is one of the main design parameters for road engineering and traffic infrastructure design of, for example, highways, railways, runways and embankments. It is also the main soil improvement criterion. When creating any road structure with codified design resistance, one employs structural layers of certain thicknesses and modulus of deformation. Both values need to satisfy the minimum values in accordance with codified requirements. This paper analyzes correlations for the widely applied in engineering practice methods to determine the soil stiffness. The static test methods acknowledged to be exact enough for determining the modulus of deformation for the primary and secondary loadings. As dynamic test methods require significantly less time and financial resources, they are widely accepted in engineering practice. The dynamic methods determine only the dynamic modulus of deformation. Design practice aims to relate it with the static modulus of deformation of the secondary loading. Many countries propose codified correlations, with differing levels of conservatism, to convert the dynamic modulus of deformation into the static one. Developed correlations between the results of the static plate load test and the dynamic plate load tests processed from own test results of different soils are presented and a comparative analysis with other proposed correlations is given.
Publisher
Riga Technical University
Subject
Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference35 articles.
1. AASHTO. (2017). AASHTO T 307 Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials.
2. Adam, D., & Kopf, F. (2003). Messtechnische und theoretische Untersuchungen als Grundlage für die Weiterentwicklung und normative Anwendung der dynamischen Lastplatte (Leichtes Fallgewichtsgerät), Mitteilungen des Instituts für Grundbau und Bodenmechanik der Technischen Universität Braunschweig, (68), 1–20.
3. Bertuliene, L. (2011). Assessment, Research and Use of Methods for Determining the Strength of Base Courses of Road Pavement Structure (Doctoral Thesis, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania). https://doi.org/10.20334/1928-M
4. Bertulienė, L., Juknevičiūtė-Žilinskienė, L., Sivilevičius, H., & Laurinavičius, A. (2018). Interaction of Physical Parameters and the Strength of Frost Blanket Course in Road Pavement Structure. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering, 13(4), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.7250/bjrbe.2018-13.426
5. Bheemasetti, T. V., Pedarla, A., Puppala, A. J. & Acharya, R. (2015). Design of Sustainable High-Volume Pavements Using Controlled Low-Strength Material From Native Soil. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Record: journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2509(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.3141/2509-02
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献