Field Data for Evaluating 2010 Highway Capacity Manual Operational Analysis Methodology for Interchange Ramp Terminals

Author:

Fang F. Clara1,Elefteriadou Lily2,Elias Aaron3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil, Environmental, and Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Technology, and Architecture, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117.

2. Transportation Research Center, University of Florida, 365 Weil Hall, P.O. Box 116580, Gainesville, FL 32611.

3. Dowling Associates, Suite 250, 180 Grand Avenue, Oakland, CA 94612.

Abstract

Interchange ramp terminals provide connections between various highway facilities (freeway–arterial, arterial–arterial, freeway–freeway, etc.), so their efficient operation is essential. NCHRP Project 3–60 developed analysis methods for evaluating the operational performance of signalized interchange ramp terminals. Those methods were based primarily on simulated data. Further research used collected field data to evaluate the interchange analysis methodology developed under NCHRP Project 3–60 to identify application limitations and to suggest improvements. Data were collected at eight sites representing various types of interchanges with different geometric and traffic characteristics. Video cameras, mounted on existing poles on the side of the road and on nearby buildings, were used to gather traffic operation data, including demand, lane utilization, and queue length at each site. The research evaluated both individual analytic model components (such as lane utilization factors and internal queue length) and the performance of the interchange (reflected in average queue lengths and control delay). Overall, the models performed well. However, large discrepancies were observed when operating conditions of the interchange were close to capacity. The queue length prediction at the beginning of the upstream arterial or ramp phase was calibrated to modify the effective green time estimation. A new lane utilization model was based on field data for a four- or five-lane external arterial approach where the two leftmost lanes were extensions of the downstream dual left turn lanes. The findings of the work were incorporated into the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference9 articles.

1. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

2. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3