Crosswalk Confusion

Author:

Mitman Meghan Fehlig1,Ragland David R.1

Affiliation:

1. University of California Traffic Safety Center, University of California, Berkeley, 140 Warren Hall, MS 7360, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360.

Abstract

Traffic safety researchers have long argued that driver behavior outweighs physical elements (such as road design) as a causal factor in motor vehicle collisions. A fundamental causal component of pedestrian-vehicle collisions is also behavior: that of the driver and that of the pedestrian. One determinant of this behavior may be whether the driver, the pedestrian, or both understand the motor vehicle code, which demarcates the right-of-way in pedestrian-vehicle interactions. That is, inappropriate or unlawful behavior may occur because the law is not understood or is misunderstood. Previous studies have shown that drivers and pedestrians have a limited knowledge of pedestrian right-of-way laws. This research expands on these studies by specifically considering knowledge of right-of-way laws related to marked and unmarked crosswalks. Driver and pedestrian knowledge was assessed by the use of intercept surveys and focus groups conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area in California. The results confirm that a substantial level of confusion about pedestrian right-of-way laws exists. This confusion was exacerbated by intersections that had unstriped, or unmarked, crosswalks. The implications for engineering, education, and enforcement countermeasures in light of these findings are discussed; and areas for further research are proposed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference13 articles.

1. EvansL. Traffic Safety. Science Serving Society, Bloomfield Hills, Mich., 2004, pp. 336–338.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The development and application of the drivers’ attitudes of right-of-way questionnaire (DARQ);Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour;2023-04

2. Is there a relationship between time pressure and pedestrian non-compliance? A systematic review;Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour;2023-02

3. Examining the Relationships between Multimodal Environments and Multitasking Driving Behaviors;Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board;2022-07-26

4. Communicating perceptions of pedestrian comfort and safety: Structural topic modeling of open response survey comments;Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives;2022-06

5. Pedestrian Safety Practitioners’ Perspectives of Driver Yielding Behavior across Zhejiang;CICTP 2020;2020-08-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3