Abstract
The general implications of AI for libraries are much discussed in library literature. But while this discussion takes place at the library-wide level, there are also important implications for subject librarians due to the specific uses of AI in different professions and areas of study. These are often overlooked as these specializations tend to publish in subject-specific journals. This article aims to address this research gap by providing a comparison and thematic analysis of this literature. Subject-specific library journals in the areas of law, health sciences, business, and humanities and social sciences were searched to identify relevant journal articles that discussed AI. 131 articles were identified and tagged with at least one category that reflected the nature of the discussion around AI. The following analysis showed that literature related to law had the greatest number of articles by far, though the publishing activity in all disciplines has increased significantly in the last 10 years. This article explores these trends to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the implications for subject-specific library work.
Publisher
University of Toronto Libraries - UOTL
Reference80 articles.
1. Ali, Muhammad Yousuf, Salaman Bin Naeem, and Rubina Bhatti. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence Tools and Perspectives of University Librarians: An Overview.” Business Information Review 37 (3): 116–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382120952016
2. Allison, DeeAnn. 2012. “Chatbots in the Library: Is It Time?” Library Hi Tech 30 (1): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213238
3. American Association of Law Libraries. 2022. “2022 Biennial AALL Membership Survey Results.” American Library Association. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence.” Tools, Publications & Resources. February 4, 2019. https://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends/artificialintelligence
4. Anderson, Clifford B., and Hilary A. Craiglow. 2017. “Text Mining in Business Libraries.” Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 22 (2): 149–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2017.1285749
5. Antel, Ryan, Samira Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Elena Guadagno, Jason M. Harley, and Dan Poenaru. 2022. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality in Doctor-Patient Risk Communication: A Scoping Review.” Patient Education and Counseling 105 (10): 3038–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.06.006