Author:
SHATKIN JO ANNE,ONG KIMBERLY,EDE JAMES,WEGNER THEODORE,GOERGEN MICHAEL
Abstract
Commercialization of cellulose nanomaterials (CNs) is rapidly advancing, to the benefit of many end-use product sectors, and providing information about the safe manufacturing and handling for CNs is a priority. Safety Data Sheets (SDS) are required for industrially produced materials to communicate information on their potential health, fire, reactivity, and environmental hazards, and to provide recommendations on how to safely work with these materials. Cellulose and cellulose pulp, which have widespread commercial end uses, can create nuisance dusts when dried and are required to have SDS. We therefore expect that nanoscale forms of cellulose will also require SDS. This study identifies the currently available SDS information for CNs and highlights existing gaps in our knowledge. With U.S. and international adoption of the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for Hazard Communication, producers are required to report SDS known data and data gaps. Given the novelty of all nanomaterials, it is preferable to fill these gaps in SDS as a demonstration of our commitment to the safe production and use of these materials. To evaluate the availability of SDS information and prepare for commercialization of CNs, we assessed available safety information for CNs to identify available GHS SDS data, data gaps, and what data need to yet be developed to fully classify CNs according to the GHS. Specifically, we report on the available data and gaps regarding the toxicological profile, environmental characteristics, physical and chemical properties, exposure controls, and personal protection for cellulose nanomaterials, to encourage the development of missing data and advance safe commercialization.
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,General Materials Science,Media Technology,General Chemical Engineering,General Chemistry
Reference60 articles.
1. Shatkin, J.A., Wegner, T.H., Bilek, E.M., et al., TAPPI J. 13(5):9(2014).
2. European Chemicals Agency, “Guidance on the preparation of dossiers for harmonized classification and labeling,” European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13562/clh_guidance_draft_caracal_en.pdf <8June2016>.
3. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, “Hazard Communication Standard,” U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA, 2012. Available [Online] https://www.osha.gov/dsg/hazcom/index.html <8June2016>.
4. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Ecotoxicology and environmental fate of manufactured nanomaterials: test guidelines,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 2014. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO(2014)1&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Guidance on sample preparation and dosimetry for the safety testing of manufactured nanomaterials,” Environment Directorate, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 2012. Available [Online] http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/ mono(2012)40&doclanguage=en <8June2016>.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献