The Relationship of Hydrogen Peroxide Exposure Protocol to Bleaching Efficacy

Author:

Kwon SR1,Wertz PW2,Dawson DV3,Cobb DS4,Denehy G5

Affiliation:

1. So Ran Kwon, DDS, MS, PhD, MS, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, Center for Dental Research, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA, USA

2. Philip W. Wertz, PhD, University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Dows Institute for Dental Research, Iowa City, IA, USA

3. Deborah V. Dawson, PhD, ScM, University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Dows Institute for Dental Research, Iowa City, IA, USA

4. Deborah S. Cobb, DDS, MS, University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA

5. Gerald Denehy, DDS, MS, University of Iowa, College of Dentistry, Operative Dentistry, Iowa City, IA, USA

Abstract

SUMMARY The purpose of this study was to compare two in-office bleaching methods with respect to tooth color change and level of hydrogen peroxide penetration into the pulp cavity and to evaluate relationships between penetration level and color change. Eighty extracted canines were exposed to two different bleaching regimens (conventional vs sealed bleaching technique). After exposure to 38% hydrogen peroxide gel for one hour, hydrogen peroxide amount was estimated spectrophotometrically. Color change was measured per Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage methodology. Linear regression was used to evaluate factors affecting color change, including bleaching technique. The conventional and sealed bleaching groups showed no difference for any color change parameters (ΔL, Δa, Δb, ΔE); however, there was significantly greater hydrogen peroxide penetration in the conventional bleaching group (p<0.05). Linear modeling of the change in lightness (ΔL) showed that the increase in lightness tended to be greater for teeth with lower initial L* values (r=−0.32, p<0.05). After adjustment for initial L*, there was no evidence that ΔL differed with hydrogen peroxide penetration levels (p>0.05) or bleaching technique (mean group difference in ΔL=0.36; p>0.05).

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3