Time Frame Analysis of Potassium Nitrate and Hydrogen Peroxide Diffusion into the Pulp Chamber

Author:

Alshehri A1,Kolker J2,Teixeira E3,Xie XJ4,Fiegel J5,Wertz P6

Affiliation:

1. *Abdullah Alshehri, BDS, MS, PhD, Conservative Dental Department, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia

2. Justine Kolker, DDS, MS, PhD, College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

3. Erica Teixeira, DDS, MS. PhD, College of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

4. Xian Jin Xie, MS, MS, PhD, College of Dentistry, Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

5. Jennifer Fiegel, BS, PhD, College of Engineering Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA

6. Philip Wertz, MS, PhD, Department of Oral Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, Dows Institute for Dental Research, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA

Abstract

SUMMARY Objectives The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an innovative double-layer, single-application desensitizing/whitening technique of potassium nitrate (PN) and hydrogen peroxide (HP) diffusion at different time points. Methods and Materials Specimens were prepared from extracted caries-free human molars (n=90). Teeth were randomly assigned into four groups: Group A (HP CTRL) treated with 25% HP for 45 minutes, group B (PN CTRL) received a single-layer treatment of 5% PN for 45 minutes, group C received the double-layer treatment of 5% PN and 25% HP for 45 minutes, and group D received a 3% PN incorporated in a 40% HP gel for 45 minutes. PN and HP concentrations were measured at 5, 15, 30, and 45 minutes using standard chemical kits. Group comparisons were made using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. Pairwise tests for differences in diffusion were done, using the Tukey adjustment of p values for multiple comparisons. A significance level of 5% was used. Results Group A showed no significant difference in HP diffusion rates between the 5- and 15-minute, 15- and 30-minute, or 30- and 45-minute time points; group D showed a similar trend; however, group C differed significantly at the 5-and 15-minute time points (p=0.0004), at the 15-and 30-minute time points (p=0.0026), and the 30- and 45-minute time points (p=0.0014). For PN diffusion, groups B and C had significantly different levels at the 15-, 30-, and 45-minute time points (p=0.0005, p=0.0002, and p<0.0001, respectively); and at the 15-, 30-, and 45-minute time points, groups D and C had significantly different PN diffusion (p=0.0327, p=0.0004, and p< 0.0001, respectively). Group C had significantly different PN diffusion at the 5- and 15-minute time points (p=0.0004), the 15- and 30-minute time points (p=0.0026), and at the 30- and 45-minute time points (p=0.0014). Conclusion The double-layer technique showed superior diffusion of PN into the pulp chamber and did not affect the diffusion of HP when compared to other techniques. The double-layer technique may be suggested as an alternative tooth-whitening treatment to minimize tooth sensitivity.

Publisher

Operative Dentistry

Subject

General Dentistry

Reference31 articles.

1. Clinical trial comparing two daytime hydrogen-peroxide professional vital-bleaching systems;Gerlach;Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry,2004

2. Clinical evaluation of in-office dental bleaching treatments with and without the use of light-activation sources;Marson;Operative Dentistry,2008

3. A randomized clinical trial of in-office dental bleaching with or without light activation;Alomari;Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice,2010

4. Assessing the effect of a desensitizing agent used before in-office tooth bleaching;Tay;Journal of the American Dental Association,2009

5. Correction addendum to: Incidence of tooth sensitivity after home whitening treatment;Jorgensen;Journal of the American Dental Association,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3