Author:
Moiseev Yuri Mikhailovich
Abstract
Several related issues about urban planning science and transforming ideas of its locus within planning policy and practice are considered, and at the same time, changing positions in assessing its role are outlined. So far, there are no unambiguous answers to many complex questions, but the analysis of critical remarks and the correct response to them will help turn science into a reliable driver of urban development in the face of global challenges.
Reference17 articles.
1. Harrison P. Making planning theory real // Planning theory, 2014, 13(1) p. 65-81. DOI: 10.1177/1473095213484144
2. Harvey D. The Right to the City. New Left Review, 2008, vol. 53, pp. 23-40.
3. Moisseev I.M. Territorial metamorphosis within the formats of urban development policy. Arhitektura i stroitel'stvo Rossii, 2021, 3(239), pp. 50-57 (in Russian)
4. Vladimirov V.V., Savarenskaya T.F., Smolyar I.M. Urban planning as a system of scientific knowledge. - M.: URSS. 1999, 120 p. (in Russian)
5. March A. Practicing theory: When theory affects urban planning. Planning Theory, 2010, 9(2), 108-125.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. BEYOND THE THRESHOLDS OF UNKNOWN: HORIZONS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANALYSES;Themed collection of papers from Foreign international scientific conference «Joint innovation - joint development». Part 1. Ьу НNRI «National development» in cooperation with PS ofUA. June 2023;2023-09-22
2. Political mission of urban planning: reconciling conflicting development goals;E3S Web of Conferences;2023