Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology University of Shahrood
2. Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Tabriz University
3. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing University of Zagreb
Abstract
AbstractA cascade technique with two control loops is designed for a DC\DC Buck‐Boost converter that is a right half‐plane zero (RHPZ) structure called a non‐minimum phase system. This concept presents several challenging constraints for designing well‐behaved control techniques. Cascade controllers can provide various benefits compared with single loop controllers such as higher safety, higher robustness, and higher stability. This strategy assumes the system as a black‐box structure without the need for a mathematical model of the system. This benefit can decrease the computational burden and provides faster dynamics along with ease of implementation. This technique consisted of an outer Fractional‐order PID voltage controller tuned with the Antlion Optimizer (ALO) algorithm, which provides a reference current for the inner control loop of the Neural Network‐based LQR (NN‐LQR) controller. The basic principle in cascade controllers is a more rapid performance of the inner loop that has been satisfied with the NN‐LQR strategy, which optimizes and tunes the gains of the LQR controller and shows faster dynamics and higher robustness. It should be mentioned that the number of neurons is limited to 2 and 4 in each layer to decrease the computational burden with lower complexity. Also, the ALO algorithm is a modern nature‐inspired algorithm used to tune the PID gains with better results under‐constrained problems with diverse search spaces. Considering the negative impacts of various disturbances on a power converter, a Fractional‐order‐based PID (FO‐PID) control technique is a proper alternative since it shows higher robustness in load uncertainties along with better dynamical responses based on its extra degree of freedom. Moreover, to evaluate the superiority of this controller, two other controllers are designed using the PSO algorithm for PID and FO‐PID controllers. Finally, the presented cascade controller has been tested in various working conditions through simulation and experiment results.
Publisher
Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
Subject
General Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Software
Reference49 articles.
1. Advanced four‐mode‐modulation‐based four‐switch non‐inverting buck–boost converter with extra operation zone
2. Fishelov A. Gazit M. Radimov N.:Digital average input current control in power converter. U.S. Patent Application 10 (2018)
3. Adaptive backstepping controller design on Buck converter with a novel improved identification method
4. An Experimental Study on Zeta Buck–Boost Converter for Application in PV System
5. Design of a robust adaptive self‐tuning regulator controller on single‐phase full‐bridge grid‐connected inverter;Ghamari S.M.;Int. J. Dyn. Control,2022
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献