An Analysis of Edwin B. Wilson's Secret, Second Review of the 'A Treatise on Probability' in 1934: How It Demonstrated That Keynes's Theory of Probability Was an Interval Valued Approach to Probability and Not an Ordinal Theory-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

An Analysis of Edwin B. Wilson's Secret, Second Review of the 'A Treatise on Probability' in 1934: How It Demonstrated That Keynes's Theory of Probability Was an Interval Valued Approach to Probability and Not an Ordinal Theory

Published:2017 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1556-5068
Container-title:SSRN Electronic Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:SSRN Journal

Author:

Brady Michael Emmett

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Reference52 articles.

1. The Keynes-Knightand the de Finetti-Savage's Approaches to Probability: an Economic Interpretation;Rog�rio & Arthmar;History of Economic Ideas,2016

2. The end of Keynes and philosophy?;Bradley Bateman;The Philosophy of Keynes' Economics,2003

3. An investigation of the laws of thought on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities / by George Boole.

4. Decision Making Under Uncertainty in the Treatise on Probability: Keynes' Mathematical Solution of the 1961 Ellsberg Two Color, Ambiguous Urn Ball Problem in 1921;Michael Brady;History of Economics Review,1997

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparing Edgeworth’s, Russell’s, and Broad’s 1922 Assessments of Keynes’s Weight of the Evidence, Based on Chapters 6 and 26 of the A Treatise on Probability, With Levi’s, Runde’s, Weatherson’s, Joyce’s, Feduzi-Runde’s, Kasser’s and Peden’s Assessments of Keynes’s Weight of the Evidence Based on Chapter 6 of a Treatise on Probability Alone: Skipping Chapter 26 of the A Treatise on Probability Leads to a Number of Errors of Omission;SSRN Electronic Journal;2018

2. Confusing Metaphors With Mathematics in Chapter 6 of the A Treatise on Probability, When Analyzing Keynes’s Modeling of the Evidential Weight of the Argument V(a/H), Leads to confusion: If V(a/H)=W, As Defined in Chapter 26, Where 0≤w≤1, Then It Is Mathematically Impossible That Keynes’s Weight Is Monotonically Increasing;SSRN Electronic Journal;2018