1. Field Competition of Italian Artillery
2. At the heart of the Commission's theory for imposing Open Internet rules is the agency's finding that Broadband Service Provider's ("BSP") have the ability and incentive to act in ways the slow the deployment of advanced communications networks because each is a "terminating monopoly" (i.e., each firm is "dominant"). 86 In Verizon v. FCC, the D.C. Circuit agreed with this characterization of the BSP and laid out a clear path forward for the Commission to address this concern without having to engage in significant legal gymnastics 87 -an approach which the Commission embraced in its 2014 Open Internet Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 88 If the Commission were to adopt the Title II path for net neutrality rather than proceeding under Section 706, then the Commission must justify forbearance in the presence of a monopoly. Yet, the Phoenix Forbearance Order explicitly rejects forbearance in the presence of monopoly (and the agency has never forborne from price regulation in the presence of monopoly). 89 Thus, either forbearance is legitimate under monopoly and the Phoenix Forbearance Order;Tel;www.phoenix-center.org up with is colloquially referred to as
3. Tariffing Internet Termination: Pricing Implications of Classifying Broadband as a Title II Telecommunications Service;G S Ford;PHOENIX CENTER POLICY BULLETIN NO,2014
4. Section 10 Forbearance Offers No Easy Path to;L J Spiwak;The Broadband Credibility Gap,2010