Author:
Agbeko David Tsitu,Yale John,Hanson Ruby
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to explore science tutors’ knowledge of differentiated instruction in the Colleges of Education in the Volta Region of Ghana. The study employed sequential explanatory design. The participants were 32 science tutors from Colleges of Education in the Volta Region of Ghana, who were purposively selected on the basis of having direct instructional contacts with students all the time and their teaching experiences within and outside colleges. Questionnaire, Rating Scale and Interview were used to collect data. It was found that science tutors have different knowledge on content, learning style, learner interest, learner diversity, process, product and lesson planning. The findings also revealed that majority (80%) of science tutors who did not differentiate instruction in their classrooms have the knowledge of differentiated instruction but their failure to make use of DI was due to scarcity of time, complex nature of DI, high level of workload. The results also revealed that, majority (80%) of the science tutors did not use their assessment feedback to guide their instruction. These science tutors said marking schemes were always given to the students for self-correction. The results from classroom observation showed that these tutors do not teach to meet the diverse needs of learners. Majority of the participants still hold to traditional classroom teaching strategies based on one size-fits-all approach which proved to be ineffective. The study recommended that mentoring universities should organize workshops on the differentiated instructional for tutors and mount course in DI for student teachers.
Reference48 articles.
1. Agbenyega, J. & Deku, P. (2011). Building new identities in teacher preparation for education in Ghana. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved: September 8, 2014. Website: http://cie.asu.edu & www.googleadvancedsearch.com
2. Agbenyega, J. S. (2006). Corporal punishment in the schools of Ghana: Does inclusive education suffer? The Australian Educational Researcher, 33(3), 107-122.
3. Alhassan, A. M. (2014). Teachers’ implementation of inclusive education in Ghanaian primary schools: An insight into government policy and practice. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(2), 115-129.
4. Ampiah, J. C. (2008). Quality basic education in Ghana: Prescription at the experience sharing service. Journal of International Development, 61(1), 59-76.
5. Anamuah-Mensah, J. & Ankomah Y. A. (2010). Achieving quality universal basic education: Making the dream a reality. Retrieved: September 8, 2014. Website: http://cie.asu.edu & www.googleadvancedsearch.com