Abstract
Academic institutions migrated to modular teaching-learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic. To ensure the quality of the pedagogical innovations employed, the study determined the students’ evaluation of the faculty prepared instructional modules for the courses they enrolled in during the first and second semesters of Academic Year 2020-2021. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study was participated by 644 students from three colleges who were then available during the data gathering. Data gathered through online surveys were then analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient utilizing jamovi software. Results revealed that the faculty-prepared instructional modules were acceptable and satisfactory to the students. Besides, the students' evaluation of the instructional modules was positively related to their level of satisfaction. Still, the students recommended that a review of the modules be done before sending the modules; a more extended time allotment is considered, and sufficient concrete examples are given in the modules. With this, the faculty concerned are encouraged to review the phases involved in the design, development, and distribution of the instructional modules to make them highly acceptable and very satisfactory to the students while maintaining the quality of both the content and aesthetics of the learning materials. Considering the study’s limitations, further endeavors may be carried out to validate this pedagogical innovation.
Publisher
Camarines Sur Polytechnic Colleges
Reference31 articles.
1. Ambayon, C. M. (2020, August). Modular-Based Approach and Students’ Achievement in Literature. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(3), 32. Retrieved 2022-06-16, from https://www.journals.aiac.org.au/ index.php/IJELS/article/view/6198 doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.8n.3p.32
2. Ancheta, R., & Ancheta, H. (2020). The New Normal in Education: A Challenge to the Private Basic Education Institutions in the Philippines? International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 1(1), 1–19. Retrieved 2022-06-16, from https://iiari.org/journal_article/v1-104/ doi: 10.53378/345960
3. APRIL CLARICE C. BACOMO, LUCY P. DACULAP, MARY GRACE O. OCAMPO, CRYSTALYN D. PAGUIA, JUPETH T. PENTANG, & RONALYN M. BAUTISTA. (2022, May). MODULAR LEARNING EFFICIENCY: LEARNER’S ATTITUDE AND PERFORMANCE TOWARDS SELF-LEARNING MODULES. Retrieved 2022-06-16, from https:// zenodo.org/record/6511718 doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.6511718
4. Atmowardoyo, H. (2018, January). Research Methods in TEFL Studies: Descriptive Research, Case Study, Error Analysis, and R & D. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(1), 197. Retrieved 2022-06-16, from http://www.academypublication.com/issues2/jltr/vol09/01/25.pdf doi: 10.17507/jltr.0901.25
5. Balbin, V. C., Bautista, R. G., Guinumtad, M. L., & Camayang, A. G. G. (2021, August). Faculty Performance in the Delivery of Modular Teaching during the CoViD-19 Pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(7), 5166–5181. Retrieved 2022-06-16, from https://www.tojqi.net/index.php/journal/article/view/4594
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献