Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">I use the disability studies framework and autoethnography method in this qualitative research to examine my lived experiences in education and their impact on the disability community. The qualitative research method focuses on obtaining data through open-ended and conversational communication. This method is about what people think and why they think so. Disability Studies is an interdisciplinary body of intellectual work that positions disability positively and complexly, interrogating rhetoric that disability is a deficit that experts should remedy. Autoethnography is a research method and methodology which uses the researcher’s personal experience as data to describe, analyze and understand cultural experience. I focus on my disability community membership, professional development, and ways I integrate social justice in teacher education to correct education systems into ones that value disabled people. Using the self-study technique, I review my education journey and identities and how they have shaped me into a teacher educator who believes education leverages us to question happenings and provide solutions. I, therefore, reflect on the entwinement of my scholarship and community outreach and how they are geared towards creating and advancing a local and global pluralistic society that values disabled people. My values of collaboration, innovation, integrity, excellence, access, diversity, equity, equality, and inclusion are best practices that dismantle educational barriers and empower educators and disabled people. </p>
Publisher
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Reference59 articles.
1. Aud, S., Hussar, W., Kena, G., Bianco, K., Frohlich, L., Kemp, J., & Tahan, K. (2011). The condition of education 2011. National Center for Education Statistics & Institute of Education Sciences. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011033.pdf
2. Baglieri, S., & Lalvani, P. (2020). Undoing ableism: Teaching about disability in K-12 classrooms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351002868
3. Baglieri, S., Valle, J., Connor, D., & Gallagher, D. (2011). Disability Studies in Education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362200
4. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227918
5. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (2000). Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms of governing the motivational effects of goal systems. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives (pp. 202–214). Psychology Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献