Author:
Sawah Kency Obed,Kusaka Satoshi
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">Internal and external assessment instruments, such as the Vanuatu Standard Test of Achievements (VANSTA) and the Pacific Island Literacy and Numeracy Assessment (PILNA), reveal that mathematics achievements in the Republic of Vanuatu remain below the minimum standard. This study drew on the constructivist grounded theory approach to explore teachers' perspectives of the learning and teaching processes in mathematics education in the Republic of Vanuatu. Specifically, the focus was on the ‘I do-we do-you do’ approach of teaching, which is common in mathematics education in the country. Teachers' opinions about the current situation of mathematics education and possibilities for improving it were extracted using semi-structured interviews with 22 teachers from two randomly selected urban schools. Based on the constructivist grounded theory analysis, four major interlink themes were found. Overall, the findings show that mathematics achievements in the country can be improved through proven discovery-learning strategies for stimulating students' mathematical thinking in the 21st century, such as the ‘try-understand-apply-mastered’ (TUAM) discovery learning process.</p>
Publisher
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Reference32 articles.
1. Ailincai, R., & Gabillon, Z. (2018). Analysing teachers’ representations of digital technology using a grounded theory approach. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10), Article em1595. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93380
2. Akcanca, N. (2020). 21st century skills: The predictive role of attitudes regarding STEM education and problem-based learning. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(5), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.277.27
3. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
4. Asmuss, S., & Budkina, N. (2009). Counterexamples in multivariable differential calculus. In M. Lepik (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference Teaching Mathematics: Retrospective and Perspectives (pp. 129–136). Tallinn University. https://l24.im/7px3m
5. Baker, W., Czarnocha, B., Dias, O., & Prabhu, V. (2012). Problem-solving in remedial mathematics: A jumpstart to reform. In M. S. Trigo, Z. Gooya, M. G. Park, C. Jiang, & D. Jaguthsing (Eds.), 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Mathematical Problem Solving (pp. 60–71). International Mathematics Union.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献