Author:
Sulistyowati Endang,Rohman Arif,Hukom Julham
Abstract
<p style="text-align:justify">Each student has a different amount of time to fully understand information, students with high academic ability (UA) need less time than students with low academic ability (LA). Teachers should apply learning models that can facilitate their study time according to their individual needs. The aim of this research is to assess which learning model is most optimal in reducing the gap in understanding mathematical concepts between UA and LA students. Apart from that, this research also evaluates the effectiveness of implementing the flipped class (FC) model in increasing students' understanding of mathematical concepts, compared to the problem-based learning (PBL) model and conventional learning models. The research method used was the N-Gain Test and ANCOVA. The research results show that the FC model is the most optimal in reducing the gap in understanding mathematical concepts between LA and UA students. In addition, both FC and PBL models have proven effective in increasing students' understanding of mathematical concepts when compared to conventional models. Future research could consider combining the FC model with PBL or other learning models to see whether combining these models can improve students' understanding of mathematical concepts more significantly.</p>
Publisher
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Reference55 articles.
1. Abraham, M. R., Williamson, V. M., & Westbrook, S. L. (1994). A cross‐age study of the understanding of five chemistry concepts. Journal of research in science teaching, 31(2), 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310206
2. Adeyemo, S. A., & Babajide, V. F. T. (2014). Effects of mastery learning approach on students’ achievement in physics. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 5(2), 910-920.
3. Amalia, E., Surya, E., & Syahputra, E. (2017). The effectiveness of using problem based learning (PBL) in mathematics problem solving ability for junior high school students. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 3(2), 3402-3406. https://bit.ly/3IFyBiy
4. Angelone, L., Warner, Z., & Zydney, J. M. (2020). Optimizing the technological design of a blended synchronous learning environment. Online Learning, 24(3), 222-240. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2180
5. Ayas, A., Özmen, H., & Çalik, M. (2010). Students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter at secondary and tertiary level. International journal of science and mathematics education, 8, 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9167-x