Affiliation:
1. Politecnico di Milano, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Via La Masa 1, 20156, Milano, IT
Abstract
<p>This paper introduces a new methodology to assess the influence of a windscreen on the crosswind performance of trains running on a bridge. Considering the difficulties encountered in both carrying out wind tunnel tests that consider the vehicle speed or complete CFD analyses, a simplified CFD approach is here discussed. Instead of simulating simultaneously the windscreen plus the moving train, the numerical problem is split into two parts: firstly, a simulation of the windshield alone is used to extract the perturbed velocity profile at the railway location; secondly, this profile used as an inlet condition for the wind velocity acting on an isolated train. The method is validated against a complete train plus windshield simulation in terms of pressure distribution and aerodynamic force coefficients on the train, and flow streamlines. This approach opens to the possibility of evaluating the aerodynamic performance of a vehicle on bridges considering bridge and vehicle as separated. Wind velocity profiles measured on the bridge during a wind tunnel campaign could be used as the initial condition for numerical simulations on vehicles.</p>
Publisher
International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
Reference21 articles.
1. EN 14067-6 "Railway applications – Aerodynamics – Part 6: Requirements and test procedures for crosswind assessment" January 2010
2. TSI, HSRST. Technical specification for interoperability relating to the ‘rolling stock’sub-system of the trans-European high-speed rail system. Official Journal of the European Union L, 2008, 847132.
3. PREMOLI, A., et al. Comparison between steady and moving railway vehicles subjected to crosswind by CFD analysis. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2016, 156: 29-40.
4. SCHULTE-WERNING, Burkhard. The TRANSAERO Project. In: TRANSAERO—A European Initiative on Transient Aerodynamics for Railway System Optimisation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. p. 11-24.
5. MATSCHKE, Gerd. WP1 Side wind effects: Summary and Conclusions. In: TRANSAERO—A European Initiative on Transient Aerodynamics for Railway System Optimisation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. p. 87-97.