Abstract
The article is devoted to the relevance of the social values of liberal-democratic societies during the war, their structural features, and their role in the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine. The corresponding values include safety, diversity, selectivity, normativity, freedom, equality, order, stability, development, independence, and strength.
The empirical part of the study is based on the results of an online survey conducted in July 2022. The sample size is 2,350 respondents (women – 51,3 %, men – 48,7 %, average age – 37,3 years). The structure of the sample repeats the structure of the urban population of Ukraine aged 18 to 55 at the beginning of the war in settlements with 50 thousand inhabitants or more for all regions, except the following groups: 1) population on the territories of Donetsk and Luhansk regions temporarily occupied at the beginning of the war, as well as AR Crimea; 2) population on other territories of Luhansk region; 3) population on the territories of Kherson region.
The ranking of societal values (Condorcet method) was established: safety (80,5 %), strength (63,8 %), order (61,3 %), normativity (58,9 %), equality (53,6 %), liberty (48,4 %), stability (44,0 %), independence (37,4 %), development (35,6 %), diversity (34,1 %), selectivity (32.3 %).
Two clusters are identified in the structure of societal values. The first includes order, safety, diversity, selectivity, normativity, liberty, and equality. In general, this value cluster emphasizes the need for internal balance, which is a fundamental guarantee of national resilience during a large-scale war, as it preserves the ability of society to generate additional resources needed by the state. The second value cluster includes strength, development, independence, and stability. This substructure is related to that part of national resilience responsible for responding to external crises and challenges.
Forecasts were made regarding the priority relevance of almost all societal values in the period of post-war reconstruction: 1) safety due to the damage caused by the war to the population and territories of Ukraine; 2) strength due to the successes of Ukraine in the defense and diplomatic spheres; 3) order due to the inadmissibility of cleavage narratives in society; 4) normativity due to the request for implementation of the rule of law; 5) equality due to the need for support of broad sections of the population from the state; 6) liberty due to the need of gradual easing of restrictions that arose due to the war; 7) stability due to the constant demand for it in peacetime; 8) development due to its fundamental importance for the national subjectivity of Ukraine; 9) diversity due to modern landmarks of civilizational development; 10) selectivity due to the need for effective management decisions.
Publisher
Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
Reference24 articles.
1. Afanasieva, L., & Glunska, L. (2018). Intercultural Consolidation as a Guarantee of National Unity and Stability in Ukraine. Sociological Studios. 1(12), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-06-11
2. Brzezinski, Z. (2019). The Grand Chessboard. Kharkiv: Publ. House Ranok: Fabula, 288.
3. Bosse, G. (2022). Values, rights, and changing interests: The EU's response to the war against Ukraine and the responsibility to protect Europeans. Contemporary Security Policy, 43(3), 531-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2099713
4. Dembitskyi, S. (2022). Interpersonal political and psychological tension of the population of Ukraine. KIIS. Retrieved February 12, 2022 from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=1098&page=6
5. Dembitskyi, S. (2020). The civilizational subjectivity of Ukraine from the point of view of societal values: the state of mass consciousness. In: Ukraine as a civilizational subject of history and modernity, Ed. Pirozhkov S. et al., Kyiv: Nika-Center, 195-207. Retrieved October 12, 2022 from https://files.nas.gov.ua/PublicMessages/Documents/0/2021/04/210428200554623-8252.pdf