Absolute Numbers of Lives Saved and Overdiagnosis in Breast Cancer Screeninq, from a Randomized Trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England

Author:

Duffy Stephen W1,Tabar Laszlo2,Olsen Anne Helene1,Vitak Bedrich3,Allgood Prue C1,Chen Tony H H4,Yen Amy M F4,Smith Robert A5

Affiliation:

1. CR-UK Centre for Epidemiology, Statistics and Mathematics, Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK

2. University School of Medicine, Uppsala, Sweden Department of Mammography, Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden

3. Department of Mammography, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

4. Division of Biostatistics/Centre of Biostatistics Consultation, Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

5. Department of Cancer Control Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

Objectives To estimate the absolute numbers of breast cancer deaths prevented and the absolute numbers of tumours overdiagnosed in mammographic screening for breast cancer at ages 50–69 years. Setting The Swedish Two-County randomized trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer, and the UK Breast Screening Programme in England, ages 50–69 years. Methods We estimated the absolute numbers of deaths avoided and additional cases diagnosed in the study group (active study population) of the Swedish Two-County Trial, by comparison with the control group (passive study population). We estimated the same quantities for the mortality and incidence rates in England (1974–2004 and 1974–2003, respectively). We used Poisson regression for statistical inference. Results A substantial and significant reduction in breast cancer mortality was associated with screening in both the Two-County Trial ( P < 0.001) and the screening programme in England ( P < 0.001). The absolute benefits were estimated as 8.8 and 5.7 breast cancer deaths prevented per 1000 women screened for 20 years starting at age 50 from the Two-County Trial and screening programme in England, respectively. The corresponding estimated numbers of cases overdiagnosed per 1000 women screened for 20 years were, respectively, 4.3 and 2.3 per 1000. Conclusions The benefit of mammographic screening in terms of lives saved is greater in absolute terms than the harm in terms of overdiagnosis. Between 2 and 2.5 lives are saved for every overdiagnosed case.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

Cited by 205 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Tumor Doubling Time and Screening Interval;Radiologic Clinics of North America;2024-07

2. The effect of the COVID-19 health disruptions on breast cancer mortality for older women: a semi-Markov modelling approach;Scandinavian Actuarial Journal;2024-05-13

3. Identification of Breast Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithm;2024 2nd International Conference on Networking and Communications (ICNWC);2024-04-02

4. Data-driven overdiagnosis definitions: A scoping review;Journal of Biomedical Informatics;2023-11

5. Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Using Radiomics Features of Mammography Images;Journal of Personalized Medicine;2023-10-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3