Falsely elevated troponin I results due to outliers indicate a lack of analytical robustness

Author:

Ungerer Jacobus P J1,Pretorius Carel J1,Dimeski Goce1,O'Rourke Peter K2,Tyack Shirley A1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Chemical Pathology, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane

2. Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Aims Troponin (Tn) is the preferred biochemical marker for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Spurious false Tn results (outliers) may cause significant problems with clinical management. We investigated the occurrence of outliers and whether this phenomenon could be explained by analytical imprecision. Methods and results Troponin I (TnI) was measured in duplicate with Beckman AccuTnI reagent if the first TnI result was ≥0.04 μg/L ( n = 5265). All TnI requests were performed in duplicate in a subset of samples for one calendar month ( n = 881). A total of 13,178 TnI requests were received during the study period. Variables were sample type, centrifugation speed and analyser. Results were identified as outliers when the difference between two results exceeded a critical difference (CD) limit defined by CD = z × √2 × SDAnalytical. Outliers at the 0.0005 probability level were detected in 102 of 5265 duplicate observations (1.94 ± 0.37%). This translated into an outlier rate of 0.55 ± 0.13% for all TnI results and 1.37 ± 0.31% for results above 0.04 μg/L. Outliers resulted only in falsely elevated TnI values and were not dependent on the analyser, centrifugation speed or sample type. Conclusion TnI outliers occurred more frequently than anticipated, could not be explained by analytical imprecision and indicated a lack of robustness in the assay. The high rate and the magnitude of the errors will complicate clinical management and carry a risk of detrimental patient outcome. The outlier rate is a useful parameter to define the robustness of assays.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,General Medicine

Cited by 26 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3