Effect of Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Author:

Salles-Cunha Sergio X.1,Ascher Enrico1,Hingorani Anil P.1,Markevich Natalia1,Schutzer Richard W.1,Kallakuri Sreedhar1,Yorkovich William1,Hou Alexander1

Affiliation:

1. Vascular Surgery Division, Vascular Institute of New York, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Abstract

Although ultrasonography (US) advantageously portrays lumen and wall thickness, velocity criteria have been used primarily to interpret carotid artery stenosis. The relationship of US and velocity measurements was investigated. Peak-systolic and end-diastolic velocities (PSV, EDV) increase exponentially as the lumen of the internal carotid artery narrows and the percent stenosis (%S) increases. We tested the consistency of the relationship between carotid velocities and US %S in two distinct data sets. One data set was used to obtain regression equations relating velocity parameters and %S based on US. Validation of these equations was conducted using a separate, independent data set. US measurements were classified in 12 %S intervals. PSV, EDV, the ratio of the internal carotid artery to the common carotid artery PSV, and %S were entered consecutively until 10 records for each %S interval were obtained. Regression equations obtained in the first data set were used to predict %S in the second data set. Predicted %S was then compared with actual US %S. The highest correlation in the first data set ( r = .89) was between %S and the natural logarithm (ln) of PSV. This ln PSV -%S equation was then applied to a second data set of an additional 120 carotid duplex images. In the second data set, actual %S and PSV–predicted %S differed by > 10% in 38 cases (32%). When all velocity-%S regression equations were used for comparison, differences between actual and at least one velocity-predicted %S were > 10% in 19% of the arteries. Conversely, actual %S matched at least one prediction of %S based on velocity data in 81% of the cases. US %S differed significantly from single velocity-based estimates of %S in at least one-third of the cases. On the other hand, four of five US measurements were confirmed by at least one velocity parameter. Emphasis on US, in addition to velocity data, is recommended for the interpretation of duplex US carotid examinations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3