One-trial conditioned taste aversion in Lymnaea: good and poor performers in long-term memory acquisition
Author:
Sugai Rio1, Azami Sachiyo1, Shiga Hatsuki1, Watanabe Takayuki1, Sadamoto Hisayo2, Kobayashi Suguru2, Hatakeyama Dai1, Fujito Yutaka3, Lukowiak Ken4, Ito Etsuro12
Affiliation:
1. Division of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, North 10, West 8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan 2. Laboratory of Functional Biology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Kagawa Campus, Tokushima Bunri University, 1314-1 Shido, Sanuki 769-2193,Japan 3. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University,South 1, West 17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan 4. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW,Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1, Canada
Abstract
In the majority of studies designed to elucidate the causal mechanisms of memory formation, certain members of the experimental cohort, even though subjected to exactly the same conditioning procedures, remember significantly better than others, whereas others show little or no long-term memory (LTM)formation. To begin to address the question of why this phenomenon occurs and thereby help clarify the causal mechanism of LTM formation, we used a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure on individuals of the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis and analyzed their subsequent behavior. Using sucrose as an appetitive stimulus and KCl as an aversive stimulus, we obtained a constant ratio of `poor' to `good' performers for CTA–LTM. We found that approximately 40% of trained snails possessed LTM following a one-trial conditioning procedure. When we examined the time-window necessary for the memory consolidation, we found that if we cooled snails to 4°C for 30 min within 10 min after the one-trial conditioning, LTM was blocked. However, with delayed cooling (i.e. longer than 10 min), LTM was present. We could further interfere with LTM formation by inducing inhibitory learning (i.e. backward conditioning) after the one-trial conditioning. Finally, we examined whether we could motivate snails to acquire LTM by depriving them of food for 5 days before the one-trial conditioning. Food-deprived snails, however, failed to exhibit LTM following the one-trial conditioning. These results will help us begin to clarify why some individuals are better at learning and forming memory for specific tasks at the neuronal level.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference68 articles.
1. Alexander, J., Audesirk, T. E. and Audesirk, G. J.(1984). One-trial reward learning in the snail Lymnaea stagnalis.J. Neurobiol.15,67-72. 2. Alkon, D. L., Ikeno, H., Dworkin, J., McPhie, D. L., Olds, J. L., Lederhendler, I., Matzel, L., Schreurs, B. G., Kuzirian, A., Collin, C. et al. (1990). Contraction of neuronal branching volume: an anatomic correlate of Pavlovian conditioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87,1611-1614. 3. Azami, S., Wagatsuma, A., Sadamoto, H., Hatakeyama, D., Usami,T., Fujie, M., Koyanagi, R., Azumi, K., Fujito, Y., Lukowiak, K. et al.(2006). Altered gene activity correlated with long-term memory formation of conditioned taste aversion in Lymnaea.J. Neurosci. Res.84,1610-1620. 4. Benjamin, P. R., Staras, K. and Kemenes, G.(2000). A systems approach to the cellular analysis of associative learning in the pond snail Lymnaea.Learn. Mem.7,124-131. 5. Berman, D. E. and Dudai, Y. (2001). Memory extinction, learning anew, and learning the new: dissociations in the molecular machinery of learning in cortex. Science291,2417-2419.
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|