Mechanical and energetic consequences of rolling foot shape in human walking

Abstract

Summary During human walking, the center of pressure under the foot progresses forward smoothly during each step, creating a wheel-like motion between the leg and the ground. This rolling motion might appear to aid walking economy, but the mechanisms that may lead to such a benefit are unclear, since the leg is not literally a wheel. We propose that there is indeed a benefit, but less from rolling than from smoother transitions between pendulum-like stance legs. The velocity of the body center of mass (COM) must be redirected in that transition, and a longer foot reduces the work required for the redirection. Here we develop a dynamic walking model that predicts different effects from altering foot length as opposed to foot radius, and test it by attaching rigid, arc-like foot bottoms to humans walking with fixed ankles. The model suggests that smooth rolling is relatively insensitive to arc radius, whereas work for the step-to-step transition decreases approximately quadratically with foot length. We measured the separate effects of arc-foot length and radius on COM velocity fluctuations, work performed by the legs, and metabolic cost. Experimental data (N = 8) show that foot length indeed has much greater effect on both the mechanical work of the step-to-step transition (23% variation, P = 0.04) and the overall energetic cost of walking (6%, P = 0.03) than foot radius (no significant effect, P > 0.05). We found a minimum of metabolic energy cost for an arc foot length about 29% of leg length, roughly comparable to human foot length. Our results suggest that the foot’s apparently wheel-like action derives less benefit from rolling per se than from reduced work to redirect the body COM.