A functional comparison of mutations in integrin β cytoplasmic domains
Author:
Bodeau Amy L.1, Berrier Allison L.1, Mastrangelo Anthony M.1, Martinez Robert1, LaFlamme Susan E.2
Affiliation:
1. The Center for Cell Biology and Cancer Research, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA 2. Author for correspondence (e-mail: laflams@mail.amc.edu )
Abstract
Cell adhesion is a multistep process that requires the interaction of integrins with their ligands in cell attachment, the activation of integrin-triggered signals, and cell spreading. Integrin β subunit cytoplasmic domains (β tails) participate in regulating each of these steps; however, it is not known whether the same or different regions within β tails are required. We generated a panel of amino acid substitutions within the β1 and β3 cytoplasmic domains to determine whether distinct regions within β tails regulate different steps in adhesion. We expressed these β cytoplasmic domains in the context of interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor (tac) chimeras and tested their ability to activate tyrosine phosphorylation, to regulate β1 integrin conformation and to inhibit β1 integrin function in cell attachment and spreading. We found that many of the mutant β1 and β3 chimeras either had no effect on these parameters or dramatically inhibited the function of the β tail in most assays. However, one set of analogous Ala substitutions in the β1 and β3 tails differentially affected the ability of the tac-β1 and tac-β3 chimeras to activate tyrosine phosphorylation. The tac-β1 mutant containing Ala substitutions for the VTT motif did not signal, whereas the analogous tac-β3 mutant was able to activate tyrosine phosphorylation, albeit not to wild-type levels. We also identified a few mutations that inhibited β tail function in only a subset of assays. Ala substitutions for the Val residue in the VTT motif of the β1 tail or for the conserved Asp and Glu residues in the membrane-proximal region of the β3 tail greatly diminished the ability of tac-β1 and tac-β3 to inhibit cell spreading, but had minimal effects in other assays. Ala substitutions for the Trp and Asp residues in the conserved WDT motif in the β1 tail had dramatic effects on the ability of tac-β1 to regulate integrin conformation and function in cell spreading, but had no or intermediate effects in other assays. The identification of mutations in the β1 and β3 tails that specifically abrogated the ability of these β tails to regulate β1 integrin conformation and function in cell spreading suggests that distinct protein interactions with β tails regulate β cytoplasmic domain function in these processes.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Reference47 articles.
1. Akiyama, S. K., Yamada, S. S., Yamada, K. M. and LaFlamme, S. E. (1994). Transmembrane signal transduction by integrin cytoplasmic domains expressed in single-subunit chimeras. J. Biol. Chem.269, 15961-15964. 2. Bazzoni, G., Ma, L., Blue, M.-L. and Hemler, M. E. (1998). Divalent cations and ligands induce conformational changes that are highly divergent among β1 integrins. J. Biol. Chem.273, 6670-6678. 3. Belkin, A. M., Retta, S. F., Pletjushkina, O. Y., Balzac, F., Silengo, L., Fassler, R., Koteliansky, V. E., Burridge, K. and Tarone, G. (1997). Muscle β1D integrin reinforces the cytoskeleton-matrix link: modulation of integrin adhesive function by alternative splicing. J. Cell Biol.139, 1583-1595. 4. Berrier, A. L., Mastrangelo, A. M., Downward, J., Ginsberg, M. and LaFlamme, S. E. (2000). Activated R-Ras, Rac1, PI 3-kinase and PKCϵ can each restore cell spreading inhibited by isolated integrin β1 cytoplasmic domains. J. Cell Biol.151, 1549-1560. 5. Burridge, K. and Chrzanowska-Wodnicka, M. (1995). Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.12, 463-519.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|