Interpolation of animal tracking data in a fluid environment
Author:
Tremblay Yann1, Shaffer Scott A.1, Fowler Shannon L.1, Kuhn Carey E.1, McDonald Birgitte I.1, Weise Michael J.1, Bost Charle-André2, Weimerskirch Henri2, Crocker Daniel E.3, Goebel Michael E.4, Costa Daniel P.1
Affiliation:
1. University of California, Santa Cruz, Long Marine Laboratory, Center for Ocean Health, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 2. Centre d'Etude Biologiques de Chizé, 79360 Villiers en Bois,France 3. Department of Biology, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928,USA 4. NOAA, National Marine Fisheries, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, CA 92038, USA
Abstract
SUMMARY
Interpolation of geolocation or Argos tracking data is a necessity for habitat use analyses of marine vertebrates. In a fluid marine environment,characterized by curvilinear structures, linearly interpolated track data are not realistic. Based on these two facts, we interpolated tracking data from albatrosses, penguins, boobies, sea lions, fur seals and elephant seals using six mathematical algorithms. Given their popularity in mathematical computing,we chose Bézier, hermite and cubic splines, in addition to a commonly used linear algorithm to interpolate data. Performance of interpolation methods was compared with different temporal resolutions representative of the less-precise geolocation and the more-precise Argos tracking techniques. Parameters from interpolated sub-sampled tracks were compared with those obtained from intact tracks. Average accuracy of the interpolated location was not affected by the interpolation method and was always within the precision of the tracking technique used. However, depending on the species tested, some curvilinear interpolation algorithms produced greater occurrences of more accurate locations, compared with the linear interpolation method. Total track lengths were consistently underestimated but were always more accurate using curvilinear interpolation than linear interpolation. Curvilinear algorithms are safe to use because accuracy, shape and length of the tracks are either not different or are slightly enhanced and because analyses always remain conservative. The choice of the curvilinear algorithm does not affect the resulting track dramatically so it should not preclude their use. We thus recommend using curvilinear interpolation techniques because of the more realistic fluid movements of animals. We also provide some guidelines for choosing an algorithm that is most likely to maximize track quality for different types of marine vertebrates.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
Insect Science,Molecular Biology,Animal Science and Zoology,Aquatic Science,Physiology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference38 articles.
1. Alerstam, T., Gudmundsson, G. A. and Larsson, B.(1993). Flight tracks and speed of Antarctic and Atlantic seabirds: radar and optical measurements. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B340,55-67. 2. Angel, E. (2003). Interactive Computer Graphics: A Top-Down Approach Using Opengl. Boston:Addison Wesley Professional. 3. Austin, D., McMillan, J. I. and Bowen, W. D.(2003). A three-stage algorithm for filtering erroneous Argos satellite locations. Mar. Mamm. Sci.19,371-383. 4. Bartels, R. H., Beatty, J. C. and Barsky, B. A.(1998). Bézier Curves. In An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modelling (ed. M. B. Morgan), pp. 211-245. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann. 5. BirdLife International (2004). Tracking Ocean Wanderers: The Global Distribution of Albatrosses and Petrels. Results from the Global Procellariform Tracking Workshop, 1-5 September, 2003, Gordon's Bay, South Africa. Cambridge, UK:Birdlife International.
Cited by
129 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|