Affiliation:
1. Department of Geosciences, Auburn University, 2050 Beard Eaves Coliseum, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
2. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Hardin Hall, 3310 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0961, USA
Abstract
AbstractEarth systems thinking (EST), or thinking of the Earth as a complex system made up of interworking subsystems, has been shown to reflect the highest level of knowing and understanding in the geosciences. Previous work has found four frameworks of EST that repeatedly appear in the geoscience education literature. This study aims to quantitatively build on this work by employing structural equation modeling to understand the current state of EST teaching as shown by the 2016 iteration of the National Geoscience Faculty Survey (United States; n = 2615). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on survey items to understand and develop three models, one for EST teaching practices, one for course changes, and one for active-learning teaching practices. Analyses revealed that reported EST teaching practices relate back to the four EST frameworks proposed in the literature. The three models explored in this study were used to build a full structural model, where it was hypothesized that active-learning teaching practices would predict EST course changes and EST teaching. However, the model revealed that EST course changes mediate, or bring about, the relationship between active-learning teaching practices and EST teaching. In other words, the relationship between active-learning and EST teaching practices is not direct. This implies the need for continued efforts to provide professional development opportunities in both active-learning teaching practices and EST, as active-learning practices are not sufficient to implicitly teach EST skills. Results also revealed that the teaching approaches that emphasize modeling and complexity sciences had the weakest relationship to the broader EST teaching practices, suggesting a need for more professional development opportunities as they relate to systems modeling, quantitative reasoning, and complexity sciences in the context of the Earth sciences.
Publisher
Geological Society of America
Reference54 articles.
1. The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning;Akınoğlu;Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,2007
2. Effect of a soil microbial activity laboratory on student learning;Appel;NACTA Journal,2014
3. A definition of systems thinking: A systems approach;Arnold;Procedia Computer Science,2015
4. Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education;Assaraf;Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2005
5. Understanding science: Why causes are not enough;Berger;Philosophy of Science,1998
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献