Affiliation:
1. University of New Mexico, USA
2. The United States Air Force Academy Preparatory School, USA
Abstract
Digital citizenship is a term that has been used globally. However, many schools have also traditionally operated on a perceived need to behaviorally control children's activity. These control mechanisms have been presented in communities using terms such as citizenship–where the children and community are led to believe that strict obedience is for the common good. In this chapter, the authors share the experiences of Green, a child identified with multiple disabilities. The authors address laws in the United States and inclusive ethics and demonstrate the potential harm that is done when digital citizenship is defined around a narrow set of compliance behaviors that are too rigid for many students without support. The authors propose an alternative framing of digital citizenship that accounts for inclusive ethics and that encircles adults and institutions in collateral obligations regarding digital technologies' ethical use. The authors end with suggestions for classroom practices that support these definitions and offer an alternative ending for Green.
Reference35 articles.
1. Digital technology and rights in the lives of children with disabilities
2. Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008, Public Law 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553 (2008).
3. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Digital Citizenship. In Cambridge dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/digital-citizenship
4. Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Digital Citizens. In Cambridge dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/digital-citizenship
5. Restricted and Repetitive Behaviours, Sensory Processing and Cognitive Style in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders