The Trust in Voting Systems (TVS) Measure

Author:

Acemyan Claudia Ziegler1,Kortum Philip1,Oswald Frederick L.1

Affiliation:

1. Rice University, USA

Abstract

It is essential to democracy that voters trust voting systems enough to participate in elections and use these systems. Unfortunately, voter trust has been found to be low in many situations, which could detrimentally impact human-computer interactions in voting. Therefore, it is important to understand the degree to which voters trust any specific voting method. Voting researchers have developed and used measures of overall trust in technology; yet researchers have long argued that trust in systems is domain-specific, implying that system-specific measures should be used instead. To address this latter point, this paper describes the development of a psychometrically reliable and validated instrument called the Trust in Voting Systems (TVS) measure. The TVS not only allows researchers to understand group mean differences in trust across voting systems; it also allows researchers to understand individual differences in trust within systems—all of which collectively serves to inform and improve voting systems.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Human-Computer Interaction,Information Systems

Reference48 articles.

1. The Relationship Between Trust and Usability in Systems

2. Does the Polling Station Environment Matter? The Relation Between Voting Machine Layouts Within Polling Stations And Anticipated System Usability

3. Usability of voter verifiable end-to-end voting systems: Baseline data for Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II.;C. Z.Acemyan;Journal of Election Technology and Systems,2014

4. Users’ Mental Models for Three End-to-End Voting Systems: Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II

5. Acemyan, C. Z., Kortum, P., Byrne, M. D., & Wallach, D. S. (2015b). From error to error: Why voters could not cast a ballot and verify their vote with Helios, Prêt à Voter, and Scantegrity II. USENIX Journal of Election Technology and Systems, 3(2).

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Tension: Fortifying Usability While Safeguarding Voter Independence in Military Voting Solutions;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2024-08-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3