Affiliation:
1. Flinders University, Australia
Abstract
As students progress through school, we expect that their knowledge about the various subject matters, such as biology or maths, becomes more extensive, well structured, and readily available for application in diverse contexts. This chapter reports the authors' enquiry about whether students' cognitive and metacognitive knowledge and strategies do grow during secondary school. Questionnaires were administered to students in three South Australian secondary schools in each of five consecutive years. Hierarchical linear modelling was used to investigate changes in students' responses over time. Results showed little change in students' reports of their cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. The disappointing growth trajectories suggest that cognitive and metacognitive strategies for learning are not subject to the explicit teaching and evaluation processes applied to other school subjects. Questions are raised about whether schools and teachers value and recognise the importance of cognitive and metacognitive strategies for good quality learning across subject domains.
Reference51 articles.
1. ACARA. (2011). The national assessment program – Literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN). Retrieved Aug 14, 2013, from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html
2. Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning.
3. Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction in regular class lessons
4. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). Note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296-298.
5. Developmental relationships among metamemory, elaborative strategy use, and associative memory
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献