Learning Design Preferences in LMOOCs

Author:

Huertas-Abril Cristina A.1ORCID,Muszyńska Barbara2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Córdoba, Spain

2. University of Lower Silesia, Poland

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have come to stay supported by the development of educational technologies, and within them Language MOOCs (LMOOCs) are a phenomenon that has risen expectations but also shown their limitations. This study aims at comparing students’ preferences from two universities (UCO, Spain, and ULS, Poland) regarding the learning design preferences of LMOOCs and analyze whether there are differences based on sociocultural context, gender and educational stage. The respondents (n = 260) stated to be in favor of a balance between the constructivist and instructionist educational practices in online language courses. The findings reveal significant differences regarding LMOOCs learning and feedback design in terms of gender and sociocultural context, while no significant differences were found between undergraduate and postgraduate students. These results may be used to plan innovative and effective learning situations that suit learners’ needs and preferences, which should lead to higher quality of learning, and higher learner engagement and satisfaction.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,Linguistics and Language,Education

Reference59 articles.

1. Delving into Participants’ Profiles and Use of Social Tools in MOOCs

2. Research on MOOCs

3. Beatty, K. (2013). Beyond the Classroom: Mobile Learning the Wider World. The International Research Foundation for English Language Education.https://bit.ly/2zvklJo

4. Integrating MOOCs in Embedded Systems Blended Courses. BRAIN.;R.Bogdan;Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience,2017

5. Integrating Cooperative Learning into the Combined Blended Learning Design Model

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3