Affiliation:
1. University of Manchester, UK
Abstract
This chapter explores how the IB operationalises a critical education through its senior school leadership against a backdrop of privilege. It draws upon original interview and observation of six directors in world leading schools. It finds that leadership understands itself as a powerful catalyst for an IB Global Citizenship Education (GCE). However, IB international schools emerge as strongholds of white Anglo-Europeanism with endemic issues of inequity in staffing and thinking which privilege white expatriate staff and continue to reinforce Anglo superiority through an uncritical cosmopolitan education. By deploying the theory of Arendt, this chapter finds the schools struggle to initiate progressive action worthy of their IB mission due to a focus on words over action by appeasing wealth over challenging injustice. The chapter suggests more modelling and less talk of IB and Eastern values and recommends international educators should begin by tackling the injustices and inequities of the international schools themselves, thereby modelling critical thinking in action.
Reference51 articles.
1. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2018). WIR2018. Retrieved November 28, 2019, from World Inequality Report: https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-summary-english.pdf
2. (Towards) decoloniality and diversality in global citizenship education
3. Soft versus Critical Global Citizenship Education
4. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献