E-Planning and Public Participation

Author:

Aitken Mhairi1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Abstract

The challenging nature of public participation in planning has been well-documented and there are frequent observations that this does not go far enough. Accordingly, since the turn of the century attention has turned to the ways in which public participation might be strengthened and improved through e-participation methods. This article aims to explore the extent to which e-planning methods address the long-standing challenges of traditional participation approaches. The article discusses some key themes within the planning theory literature relating to public participation and focusses on two important challenges which are summarised as: 1) Whose voices are heard within participatory processes, and how can less articulate voices be supported? And 2) Who controls participatory processes and to what extent, and in what ways can power be devolved to public participants? Developments in e-planning go some way to addressing these challenges; for example in opening up new channels for public participation and removing barriers to participation. However, e-planning certainly does not represent a panacea and requires critical reflection to ensure that it does not aggravate, rather than alleviate, these problems. For example, reliance on ICTs may risk leading to new inequalities in access to planning systems. Furthermore, questions relating to who participates, and who controls participation in planning processes remain relevant and pressing.

Publisher

IGI Global

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference69 articles.

1. Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation

2. Aitamurto, T., & Landemore, H. (2013). Democratic participation and deliberation in crowdsourced legislative processes: The case of the law on off-road traffic in Finland. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Communities and Technologies. Workshop: Large-Scale Idea Management and Deliberation Systems. Technische Universtitat Munich, Xerox, ACM SIGCHI.

3. Wind Power Planning Controversies and the Construction of ‘Expert’ and ‘Lay’ Knowledges

4. A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: Empowerment or social control?;M.Aitken;Planning Theory,2010

5. Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: the (not so) influential role of local objectors

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3