Bringing the Forest Home: Lessons Learned during the COVID-19 Pandemic about E-Planning in Community Forestry Contexts

Author:

Beck Samantha1,Coleman Kimberly1,Tapper J Ethan2

Affiliation:

1. Center for Earth and Environmental Science, State University of New York Plattsburgh, 101 Broad Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA

2. Chittenden County Forester, Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, 111 West St., Essex Junction, VT 05452, USA

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines “e-planning,” or the use of computer-based systems to conduct planning and decision-making, in the context of community forest management. E-planning is growing in the field of environmental planning, as it promises greater equity in terms of public participation. However, a lack of scholarly work exists on the applicability for forest planning. During the COVID-19 pandemic, county foresters and other natural resource professionals in Vermont turned to e-planning when safety restrictions limited their ability to engage in face-to-face efforts. This provided an opportunity to collect empirical data about the potential for e-planning to support the public engagement process in the context of forest planning. We provide an overview of e-planning theory and examine data from Vermont to explore the promise of e-planning for forest management. We make recommendations about the applicability of e-planning in the context of forest planning, and highlight areas for future research to investigate. Study Implications Public participation is an important component in the planning and management of public forestland. The use of e-planning, or the use of computer-based systems to conduct planning and decision-making, increased during the COVID-19 pandemic as a way to safely continue public participation efforts. Our paper suggests that e-planning may be a powerful tool for engaging both new and current stakeholders. However, we caution that there are challenges associated with e-planning, particularly issues related to technology and internet access. We encourage public land managers to consider whether e-planning is applicable to the communities they serve.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Plant Science,Forestry

Reference39 articles.

1. E-planning and public participation: addressing or aggravating the challenges of public participation in planning?;Aitken;Int. J. E-Plan. Res.,2014

2. Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning;Beierle;J. Policy Anal. Manag.,2000

3. Why won’t they come? Stakeholder perspectives on collaborative national forest planning by participation level;Cheng;Environ. Manage,2006

4. Exploring the functions of different forms of trust in collaborative natural resource management;Coleman;Soc. Nat. Resour.,2018

5. Facilitation, coordination, and trust in landscape-level forest restoration;Coleman;J. For.,2018

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3