Affiliation:
1. Governors State University, USA
2. University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA
Abstract
This chapter provides a case study from the United States regarding public capital budgeting and management on the federal, state, and local levels. The U.S. case of the public investment process (or positive theory for United States public investment) is described and compared with the normative theory outlined in Chapter 1 to understand the deviation between the positive and normative theories. This chapter presents an analysis of four main components of the USA capital budgeting system including (1) long-term public capital planning, (2) annual public budgeting and financing, (3) project execution, and (4) public infrastructure evaluation. In addition, this chapter shows public infrastructure needs and financing issues in the United States.
Reference73 articles.
1. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). Failure to act: The impact of current infrastructure investment on America’s economic future. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Issues_and_Advocacy/Our_Initiatives/Infrastructure/Content_Pieces/failure-to-act-economic-impact-summary-report.pdf
2. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013). The 2013 report card. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/a/documents/2013-Report-Card.pdf
3. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2017). The infrastructure report card. Retrieved May 2, 2018, from https://www.infrastructurerportcard.org/wp-content-uploads/2016/10/Grades-Chart.png
4. On the long run Effects of public capital and disaggregated public capital on aggregate output.;R. G.Batina;International Tax and Public Finance,1998
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献