Affiliation:
1. Politics and Public Administration Unit Governors State University
2. School of Public and Environmental Affairs Indiana University
Abstract
This paper reviews the literature on national government capital budgeting approaches, identifies the standard features expected to be found in such processes, and compares how the procedures are applied in three large and significant federations, the German Federal Republic, the Russian Federation, and the United States. the study uses a comparative case study approach to uncover contrasts, similarities, and patterns of capital budgeting in these countries. This paper examines infrastructure status and gaps and how capital budgeting procedures identified here can help resolve problems. the main finding is that effectively managing and budgeting capital expenditures are among the most pressing challenges to contemporary governments and the effort requires comprehensive and systematic planning, centralized execution and project management, and infrastructure maintenance.
Reference107 articles.
1. Local Government Capital Spending During and After Recessions: A Cause for Concern?
2. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2013) Failure to Act: The Impact of Current Infrastructure Investment on America's Economic Future, accessed May 2, 2018 (https://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Issues_and_Advocacy/Our_Initiatives/Infrastructure/Content_Pieces/failure-to-act-economic-impact-summary-report.pdf).
3. American Society of Civil Engineers (2017) The Infrastructure Report Card, accessed May 2, 2018 (https://www.infrastructurerportcard.org/wp-content-up-loads/2016/10/Grades-Chart.png).
4. Evaluating Capital Management: A New Approach
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献