Affiliation:
1. Columbia University, USA
Abstract
Thanks to the polarized nature of politics in the world today, students need to learn how to think critically about social issues. Argumentation can be both a type of critical thinking and a tool with which to teach students to think critically about social issues. This chapter lays out a framework for teaching students how to develop critical thinking about real world issues through the use of dialogic argumentation. The impact of dialogic argumentative activities in the classroom are discussed, particularly as they relate to the development of metacognition and theory of mind, as well as how they help students develop an “inner-locutor” that allows them to evaluate both their position and opposing positions. Finally, a model for how these elements contribute to students' value-loaded critical thinking about social issues is outlined.
Reference42 articles.
1. The effects of cognitive acceleration – and speculation about causes of these effects;P.Adey;AERA Research Conference, Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue,2010
2. Getting Political Science in on the Joke: Using The Daily Show and Other Comedy to Teach Politics
3. Talking about education: exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency
4. Critical Thinking
5. Boyd, N. (2018). The effects of collaboration on student writing development. Columbia University.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献